Giants of Babylon: The Nephilim on Earth

Did Giants truly exist?

Legends say these Giants fell from heaven, that they roamed the Earth in ancient times, Kings among mortals, living for thousands of years, and building grand stone monuments on every continent. Spoken of in scripture, it is said that these Giants had special knowledge, and were renown leaders of God’s people, that they were wise, and yet… also terrifying. Who were these giants? Where did they come from? Explore the known facts, and ancient lore, and decide for yourself…

“Well researched and highly entertaining.” – Extreme Mysteries

“If you ever doubted the existence of Giants on Earth, watch this film.” – UFO Insider

“Too many documented cases to ignore, and too obviously suppressed, a must for the true seeker.” – OH Krill, author of Montauk Babies

Scrolling through the myriad options I have waiting for me in the queues of my various streaming services late one night, I came across this gem, this nutball vanity production, this Youtube video with delusions of grandeur, this “documentary” that dares to ask the question: Did Giants descend from Heaven?

OR… were they aliens?

To me, the mythology of giants is most likely derived from the same kind of thinking that in modern times drives Tom Cruise and Vin Diesel to try to film themselves as if they aren’t actually 5 feet tall, meaning it’s probably just an example of history being written by the victors, an official retelling where the hero is either depicted as having been huge, and so therefore, they were awesome, or that the hero was able to beat up guys who were much bigger than them, and so therefore, they were awesome…

…despite being just little guys.

I assume.

But oh no, no, no, says this “documentary” by Alexander Weiss, Director of 16 different “films” between 2023 and 2024, including Lizard People: Rulers of Time and Space, Anunnaki: Alien Gods Before Babylon, and the upcoming Aliens, Atlantis and the Illuminati: The New America. In Giants of Babylon: The Nephilim on Earth, the film surmises that Giants were not just real, but were either Angels or Aliens, or both, with over an hour’s worth of “proof” that mostly consists of pictures of old drawings, statues, and a few strange carvings, because nothing makes guys like this more smugly assured of aliens having existed than the fact things like the Nazca lines also exist.

The Nazca Lines are a group of geoglyphs in the Nazca Desert in southern Peru. Created between 500 BC and 500 AD by the indigenous people of the area, they were made by scraping off the top layer soil in a foot wide trench to reveal the differently colored layer of soil beneath. They are mostly depictions of animals and plants, like a spider, a hummingbird, some fish, some trees and flowers, a condor, a heron, a lizard, a monkey, a dog, a cat, and also a human figure. The reason behind the creation of these drawings is unknown, but there’s over 800 miles worth of lines covering a 20 square mile area. Because of the dry and isolated location, they’ve been preserved naturally, and were designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1994.

The main reason that the kind of people who make films like this love to cite examples like the Nazca lines in their sisyphean quests to prove that Giants or Aliens or Bigfoots or Giant Alien Bigfoots actually existed, is because of the “impossibility” of their existence. Some of the Nazca lines form shapes that are best seen from the air, and because of that they ask… how could ancient people have seen them? Could they fly? No, they obviously could not, so these lines must have been drawn for the benefit and enjoyment of those ancient people’s best friends… the aliens.

Totally makes sense. The Nazca lines are basically ancient billboards. “Gas. Food. Lodging. Next Stop.”

But these same smooth-brains always fail to mention that the lines are also visible from the surrounding foothills too. They fail to mention stuff like this because A.) They simply have no idea, most likely because they haven’t done any real research on this stuff at all—outside of visiting websites that believe Noah’s Ark actually existed, of course—forget about having ever actually traveled there to see it for themselves, and B.) it serves their agenda to not mention it.

Of course, there’s also the unavoidable fact that they always point to ancient construction works in Africa or South America or Aboriginal Australia, or anywhere that isn’t considered a part of “Western Culture” and go: “Look at that! It’s amazing and huge, there’s no way those people could have built that shit themselves… it had to have been aliens,” and they do it for exactly the reasons you’d expect.

But in the end, after watching this nonsense, it’s clear that the main problem here really lies in their definition of the word “evidence.” In the worlds these people live in, the word “evidence” means “all the shit that I am more than ready to agree with right away,” and/or “all the shit that also agrees with me.”

I try to imagine the people who believe this kind of shit so much, these real life militant “L. Ron Hubbard meets Ned Flanders” goons out there, in their bad suits and weird hats, waving about clipboards and reams of computer print-outs, rattling off the names of distant solar systems and obscure characters from the Old Testament like I would with lesser known members of the Avengers, and the kind of discussions that had led them all to this point, to decide to make this thing, one of sixteen films in a series, to fund it all, to distribute it, and to then proudly tell the whole world… “Look at what I have wrought! Gaze upon its beauty! Behold its truth!”

When in reality, it’s just a long ramble “asking questions” over an incredible collection of AI-generated garbage “art” and pictures of ancient text, and paintings, and carvings, and statues, and ruins, all shown in quick succession, all from skewed angles, and all interspersed with the kind of graphics you might see at a planetarium’s midnight laser light show, saying nothing, but all with this attitude of, like… “Boom! See? Giants really existed! Proven! You wanted the truth! Can you handle the truth?”

It boggles the mind.

To the filmmakers credit, at one point, they briefly concede that there is absolutely no proof of any of this, or as they say, that there’s no “concrete evidence” of anything they claim, which is nice, but they say it like this (paraphrasing): “Since there’s no concrete evidence that giants didn’t spread all across the globe, building massive monuments and ruling the various cultures of humanity… they probably did.”

How can you argue against that?